Book Review: International Conflict Resolution Essay

The first chapter of the hold back talks about the peace-making and de-escalation strategies. It discusses the theoretical approaches of statism, pluralism and populism in reference to the outside(a) conflict. The reason of the hold convinces the reader that potent conflict solvent should make use of convincing world-beater and collateral sanctions. Therefore, he argues that win-win solutions argon accomplish able-bodied in international conflict. In the second gear chapter the relation of US and USSR and cases of Middle einsteinium atomic number 18 use to observe the de-escalation efforts.The tertiary chapter takes the example of US-USSR and Arab-Israel de-escalation activities to present virtually chronologies. 4 de-escalation patterns are identified using these chronologies absolute frequency of initiatives, multiple de-escalation initiatives, and activity level of activity among conflicting countries. In chapter four the condition explains the reasons of de-esc alation activities and its timings. Factors such as house servant situation, international perspective, and associations between conflicting parties are the presented in this chapter. (Conflict Research pond Staff, 2010)Chapter five explains the surgical procedure of initiating the process of dialogue. The reference explores several(predicate) initiatives and tells which ones are more legal for negotiations. The chapter brings into light the factors resulting in negotiations between conflicting parties. Chapter six explores the negotiation process completely. Kriesberg presents the example of US-USSR and Arab-Israel to analyze different negotiated agreements (Mitchell, 1996). Taking into account these examples, the author creates guidelines for effective negotiations. In chapter seven the author describes the consequences of negotiations.It identifies the effective negotiations leading to commodious-term de-escalation efforts. Chapter eights draws on the culture of peace mak ing efforts. With the help of his findings, he concludes the government agency in which some countries mend their relations and others still remain conflicted. The finale chapter analyzes the impacts of conflicts between nations. The author explains the cost that the countries cast off to bear and presents policies. In the end, the author comes up with the relationship between peace-making and de-escalation (Conflict Research Consortium Staff, 2010).This news is a comprehensive contain of international conflict de-escalation process. With the use of chronologies and tables, the author makes the study more meaningful and well-situated to understand. It contri besideses to the study of international relations by presenting a conflict resolution perspective. The accommodate addresses the issue which needs future consideration. Kriesbergs play lacks theoretical implication scarce it is unimaginative. International conflict resolution is pioneered in this work and brought it in to consideration. The author presents his idea in a persuasive way and explains easily why some inflicts are protracted.The leger yields some useful concepts to resolve conflicts and peace-making policies (Simon, 1994). However, apply limits itself in providing propositions about the irreversible and composite plant processes. It raises some important issues like what are the conditions that result in de-escalation initiatives? In what conditions these initiatives leads to negotiations? And finally, how these negotiations results in agreements? The author is successfully able to declaration these questions in an effective way (Holsti, 1993). Strengths and Weaknesses of the make The sacred scripture is a well nonionic and well-written by the author.It provides sound understanding of the arguments presented by the author. The unique feature of this ledger is that the author is able to identify the impacts of agreements. He is able to put forward the questions that are life-s ustaining to international relations and are steadying in peace-making agreements. However, the methodology take in evaluating these questions is off-putting but comes up with some effective conclusions and future policies. Moreover, Kriesberg is not able to fullify the causes of failed negotiations and some successful initiatives (Holsti, 1993).Hence, the book faces some lustiness issues. The analysis end-to-end the book is enriched by historical references and natural representing opportunities and constraints, both in international and domestic context. The author emphasizes that good will and the dictatorial attitude of the people is critical to negotiations. It encourages them and motivates them to work in the right direction and attain some agreements. Therefore, the book is less controversial and is able to present a broader and positive view of the author.Another advantage of this book is that it provides references according to the context that helps in the discove r understanding of the arguments and provides the author an easy way to justify his reasoning. The historical material enhances the validity of the content presented in the book. The approach adopted by the author is to provide long lasting solutions to the problems, which is a more practical approach. Kriesberg in this book is able to provide approaches that are complete in character as many authors have been providing approaches that do contribute a lot but are incomplete.Kriesberg has clearly presented the strengths and weaknesses of the concepts and approaches that he has used in the book. However, due to the use of just two major conflicts, the issue of comparability arises. The drawback of the book is that the language used in the book is difficult to understand by the reader, however, the content of the book is highly informative, providing taste into the subject. By dividing the book into number of chapters, the book is presented in a proper lessen that makes the understan ding much easier.